Deaf culture

I can say that most of us ask ourselves questions like ‘Can I explain myself or understand them correctly?’ when we meetpeople who are deaf, have become deaf later in life, or arehard of hearing. The reason for being inconvenienced withthem is that deaf people use their own language to talk witheach other [1]. In history, deaf people wanted to adapt tospoken language rather than sign language. In some papersthere is written that hearing people have used force to teachthem spoken language by tying their hands so as not to usetheir hands to communicate[2].

This writing aims to give brief information about the cultureof deaf people, the history of sign language, and thetechnologies in the lives of deaf people.

Dimensions of the deaf culture

Individuals who use American Sign Language (ASL) tocommunicate consider themselves members of Deaf culture. A difference exists between hearing loss and people who areborn deaf.Hearing loss ordeafenedpeople usually tend not to be members of the deaf community; they prefer to use lip-read or normal language instead of using sign language [1].

The deaf community can accept family members andinterpreters who identify themselves as member of thiscommunity. They believe that it is not the condition of not hearing that identifies members of the deaf community but individuals own sense and resultant actions.

The deaf community is inclusive of family members andinterpreters who actively set up their own rules. And deafnessis celebrated as a unique human experience rather than a disease that needs a “cure”. They believe that deaf peoplecommunicate more than normal people (hearing). And in thiscommunication eye contact is important [1].

Aquisitıon of the language

Charles-Michel, abbé de l’Epée, a French educator, developed a manual system for using French words, expressing everything using hands to make signs [3].Thislineage expanded to the United states in 1816 throughThomasGallaudet,the founder of the American School for theDeaf [4].

Like spoken languages s,ign languages also differ from placeto place. With over 200 distinc versions existing globally.However, due to their origins, FSL and ASL are related [5].  

   

Technologies in the life of deaf people

1. People can not use telephones or voice calls like hearingpeople do. However, updated telephones enablecommunication between deaf and hearing people. Forinstance, Smartphones allow for seamles interactionthrough text based apps. Video messages or calls areanother useful means of communication for the deafcommunity.
2. Closed captioning should be available in televisions for a deaf person to watch. Nowadays, in many apps, there areclosed captions, such as on YouTube [6].
3. Alert systems such as alarms or fire alarms should not only be voice. Vibrating or flashing lighAlert systemsshould be used so that a deaf person can notice the alert[7].
4. Social media helps the deaf community to find each otherand keep in touch. Network sites enable deaf people wholive in different countries to find the deaf culture and helpthem stay in contact [6].
5. Medical options can help deaf people hear sounds.Hearing aids do not require any surgery and are suitablefor less severe hearing loss, while cochlear implant needssurgery and are best suitable for severe hearing loss [8].

Ultimately, technology provide tools to help, but not a cure forthe culture. As society become more conscious  of thesechallenges , a better world can be designed for everyone– notjust the hearing majority [8].

     References

1. Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding deaf culture: In search of deafhood. Multilingual Matters.https://www.perlego.com/book/571632/understanding-deaf-culture-in-search-of-deafhood-pdf
2. Higgins, M., & Lieberman, A. M. (2016).  Journal of Education, 196(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600103
3. Cantin, Y., & Encrevé, F. (2022). Perspectives: On thehistoricalness of sign languages. Frontiers in Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.801862
4. Golos, D., Moses, A., Gale, E., & Berke, M. (2021). Buildingallies and sharing best practices: Cultural perspectives of deafpeople and ASL can benefit all. LEARNing Landscapes, 14(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v14i1.1028
5. Power, J. M. (2022). Historical linguistics of sign languages: Progress and problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818753
6. Garberoglio, C. L., Dickson, D., Cawthon, S., & Bond, M. (2015). Leveling the playing field? Communicationtechnology as a predictor of future attainments for deaf youngadults. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v35i4.4342
7. Xu, D., Ma, S., Yan, C., & Zhao, Z. (2023). Technologychallenges among deaf and hard of hearing elders in China: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017946
8. Tucker, B. P. (1998). Deaf culture, cochlear implants, andelective disability. The Hastings Center Report, 28(4), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528607
Denetmen: Emine ARSLAN

Yorum bırakın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir